Length Vector Effect · Full Derivation
The necessary steps of Chapter 1, Eqs. (1.1)–(1.19), with explicit measurement assumptions, motion geometry, directional projection and consistency conditions.
Based on the final manuscript · Chapter 1
01Starting Assumptions
ASD expresses the motion-associated scale as a directional physical relation: in the specified measurement configuration, with transversely. The derivation identifies the measured objects and their pairing, solves for the scale factor, projects onto the measurement direction, and returns to comparable lengths and durations. The forward and reverse construction is not imported from a standard Lorentz transformation.
This page reconstructs the necessary derivation in the order of Chapter 1, Section II. A1–A5 are website identifiers for assumptions in the manuscript, not separately numbered axioms in the book. Assumption, Mathematical Result and Physical Interpretation denote roles in the argument; they do not replace the theory-maturity or evidence-status systems.
Metrological standards and vacuum propagation
Length and time use calibrated, consistent measurement standards. Vacuum propagation uses the same , with for a specified light-propagation process. Chapter 1 begins with measurement relations without presupposing the Lorentz transformation, relativistic energy or invariant spacetime intervals. Source: Chapter 1, Sections I–II, Eq. (1.1).
Length carries a propagation and measurement direction
The manuscript writes the directional relation as , where is the effective path length along the actual propagation direction. Without a specified geometric correspondence, it cannot be replaced by the Euclidean norm of an arbitrary three-dimensional vector. A unit vector identifies the propagation or measurement direction under discussion. Source: Eq. (1.2) and the directional explanation in Section II.
Two measurement configurations in uniform relative motion
First use as reference, with moving at constant ; then consider the measurement with reversed relative motion. and must be used together with their emission and reception events and their respective configurations. ASD does not interpret a choice of reference frame itself as a change in the internal properties of calibrated clocks. Source: final manuscript, Chapter 1 §II, p0317–p0331.
A common scale factor in the forward and reverse constructions
The manuscript sets and writes for the reverse measurement. depends on speed magnitude and is the same in both directions. This construction is a theoretical input to the derivation, not a conclusion established by the unit definition alone. Source: Eqs. (1.7)–(1.9).
Path pairing used to determine the scale factor
Chapter 1 normalizes the product of forward and reverse paths to and writes the cross terms as the cancelling pair and . This page retains that step as the manuscript's pairing condition. It is not treated as an identity for arbitrary Euclidean vectors in arbitrary directions. Its geometric sufficiency is listed among the review items below.
02Measurement Relations
r denotes the effective path in the specified propagation direction. Vector notation follows the manuscript; r is not automatically an arbitrary three-dimensional Euclidean norm.
Chapter reference: Final consolidated manuscript · Chapter 1, Section II, Eqs. (1.1)–(1.2) · ASD-BOOK-ddbade997b45
For the two measurements separately:
The same c is used in each measurement. The primed object, endpoints and propagation direction must be specified together with its configuration.
Chapter reference: Final consolidated manuscript · Chapter 1, Section II, Eqs. (1.3)–(1.6) · ASD-BOOK-ddbade997b45
are the elapsed times of their respective specified propagation processes; denote the component directions used in the manuscript. The same appears in and . These relations do not yet provide a complete mapping between the two sets of events.
Chapter 1 subsequently summarizes a process relation as (Eq. 1.20, Chapter 1 §II). This explains the length–rate–elapsed-time connection. The present LVE derivation uses its vacuum-propagation instance. See Metrological Foundations for measurement history and unit realization.
03Geometric Construction
Both measurements use the same scale factor. Event pairing and inverse-mapping conditions are addressed in the consistency review. This expression is not assumed to be a Lorentz transformation.
Chapter reference: Final consolidated manuscript · Chapter 1, Section II, Eqs. (1.7)–(1.9) · ASD-BOOK-ddbade997b45
The first expression accounts for relative displacement , followed by the scale response of the moving configuration. Relative velocity reverses in the second measurement, hence the plus sign in the manuscript's third expression. The forward and reverse formulas are displayed as its two measurement constructions. No further assumption is made that they already form mutually inverse transformations acting on the same event quadruple.
Only the velocity-component expansion, the light-propagation measurement relation and the manuscript's scale-pairing rule enter the calculation. The standard Lorentz transformation is not used as an intermediate step.
04Intermediate Steps
1. Determine the scale factor using the manuscript's pairing
Chapter 1 first multiplies Eqs. (1.7) and (1.9), writing the following inner-product form. The next two displayed expressions are not separately numbered in the original chapter.
Using the path pairing and normalization in A5, the manuscript continues:
The cross terms cancel. For nonzero propagation times , this yields successively:
The positive root of the scale factor
Choose the positive root by requiring at and a continuous correspondence between positive lengths:
The positive root is taken under the manuscript’s forward/reverse pairing and normalization conditions; 0 ≤ v < c. Geometric sufficiency of the normalization remains under formal review.
Chapter reference: Final consolidated manuscript · Chapter 1, Section II, Eq. (1.10) · ASD-BOOK-ddbade997b45
This algebraic result depends on A5. The conditions relating inner-product normalization to direction must remain attached to the result.
2. Project the vector construction onto the measurement direction
Substituting the propagation relation into Eq. (1.7), manuscript Eq. (1.11) reads:
Following the directional interpretation in Chapter 1, project onto the specified and use :
Dividing by gives:
φ is the angle between observer relative velocity and the specified propagation or measurement direction. This projection result is not a general coordinate-time transformation without a synchronization rule.
Chapter reference: Final consolidated manuscript · Chapter 1, Section II, Eqs. (1.11)–(1.12) · ASD-BOOK-ddbade997b45
This preserves the manuscript's use of the same symbol for the two propagation processes. Whether a mapping between their directions is required forms part of A5 and the consistency review. The calculation does not directly take the norm of a general three-dimensional expression.
3. Return from elapsed time to length
Substitute and into the preceding relation and cancel :
r and r′ denote length scalars for the selected direction. The manuscript’s arrow notation and directional meaning are explained in the derivation.
Chapter reference: Final consolidated manuscript · Chapter 1, Section II, Eq. (1.13) · ASD-BOOK-ddbade997b45
Manuscript Eq. (1.13) retains arrows on its length symbols to emphasize direction dependence. In the scalar ratio displayed here, denote lengths along the selected direction, with retaining the directional information. The physical claim has not been converted into a coordinate effect.
05Final LVE Relation
Component route
Manuscript Eq. (1.15) restates . Set and compare components:
Set v = (v,0,0) and expand the manuscript’s vector construction. The transverse components retain γ and must not be replaced by standard Lorentz transverse-coordinate relations.
Chapter reference: Final consolidated manuscript · Chapter 1, Section II, Eqs. (1.15)–(1.18) · ASD-BOOK-ddbade997b45
Because , the translational terms in the transverse components vanish. Those components still carry the manuscript's factor , giving:
L⊥ is the reference transverse length; L′⊥ is the true length associated with motion as defined by ASD. The compared scale is perpendicular to motion; 0 ≤ v < c.
Chapter reference: Final consolidated manuscript · Chapter 1, Eqs. (1.17)–(1.19) · ASD-BOOK-ddbade997b45
Directional route
Set in the general directional relation. Then , so , manuscript Eq. (1.19). This is the same transverse factor as in Eqs. (1.17) and (1.18). The website notation explicitly identifies the transverse scale being compared.
06Physical Interpretation
The scale factor acts on real spatial relations
ASD interprets as a transverse expansion of real spatial length associated with motion. The mathematical form of the factor is the same as in SR; this does not imply identical interpretations of space or time.
When denotes light propagation over one period, Chapter 1 applies the same directional relation to wavelength and then uses to obtain the frequency relation. That application is not part of the preceding derivation of .
See Physical Meaning for the distinction between rods, measurements, wavelengths and true lengths, and for the formal comparison with SR. This page preserves the argument and its dependencies; electromagnetic, momentum and gravitational derivations belong to their respective modules.
07Domain of Validity
- The basic construction concerns uniform relative motion, specified directions and specified measurement endpoints; , with .
- The transverse result requires a scale perpendicular to the defined direction of motion. Use Eq. (1.13) for a general direction; multiplication by alone is not universal.
- The basic propagation relation refers to vacuum . Media require optical paths, refractive indices, boundary conditions and conditions for moving media.
- Rotation or changing velocity cannot be modeled merely by applying one uniform-motion expression to an entire apparatus. Segments, closed paths and clock-reading procedures must be specified.
- diverges as . Chapter 1 does not establish a superluminal domain or complete a dynamical construction of the microscopic mechanism.
08Consistency Checks
Directly reproducible checks
- Rest limit: at , , and the general directional relation reduces to , manuscript Eq. (1.14).
- Dimensions: are dimensionless. Both sides of the length relation have length units; both sides of the elapsed-time relation have time units.
- Transverse limit: at , the directional and transverse-component expressions give the same factor .
- Opposite-direction scalar factors: . This checks the product of the co- and counter-directional scalar factors; it does not prove that general vector mappings are inverses.
- Low-speed limit: the website supplies the following Taylor expansion of Eq. (1.10):
β ≪ 1. An algebraic supplement on this website obtained by expanding Chapter 1, Eq. (1.10); the manuscript assigns no separate number to this expansion.
Chapter reference: Final consolidated manuscript · Website low-speed expansion of Chapter 1, Eq. (1.10); no new manuscript number · ASD-BOOK-ddbade997b45
Mathematical definitions and application conditions requiring review
These are review records from preparation of the website module. They do not replace the original Chapter 1 expressions.
- Inner-product normalization, Chapter 1 §II: a general Euclidean inner product includes the angle between the two directions. Writing directly as and representing both cross terms with the same require an explicit path pairing and directional mapping. The original calculation is retained, with its condition identified as A5.
- Correspondence of the forward and reverse formulas, Eqs. (1.7) and (1.9): if both are interpreted as general Euclidean inverse transformations of the same event, transverse projection gives , a conflicting constraint for nonzero transverse length and nonzero speed. The measured objects, bases and endpoints in the two measurements need an explicit correspondence. This page does not assume that inverse consistency has already been established.
- Experimental mapping, Section III: the refractive-index dependence of Fizeau, muon survival distributions, actual transported-clock trajectories, and the area and timing conventions for Sagnac each require further specification. The original expressions and their review status remain on the tests page.
09Dependencies
| Step | Dependency | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Directional measurement | Chapter 1, Eqs. (1.1)–(1.6), measurement standards | A1–A3; physical and measurement inputs |
| Moving construction | Chapter 1, Eqs. (1.7)–(1.9) | A4; ASD construction |
| Determining | Forward/reverse product and path normalization | A5; conditional algebraic result |
| General directional length | , directional projection, | Eq. (1.13) |
| Transverse LVE | General directional or component relation | Eqs. (1.17)–(1.19) |
| Wavelength and frequency | LVE, , | Downstream relations, not upstream assumptions |
See Metrology for context. Later momentum, magnetic-interaction and orbital modules have their own additional inputs; they are not used to prove this scale factor retrospectively. The microscopic generating mechanism is associated with the master-equation open problem.
10Sources
The main argument comes from Chapter 1, Section II, Eqs. (1.1)–(1.19). Eq. (1.20) is used only to explain process relations. Intermediate calculations that were unnumbered in the manuscript remain unnumbered. A1–A5 and ASD-WEB-LVE IDs are website citation indices.
The external SI definition is available from BIPM. It provides metrological context, not institutional confirmation of the full ASD spatial transformation.
On this page
The solution for γ depends on the forward/reverse path pairing specified in A5. The geometric sufficiency of that pairing and the inverse interpretation of the forward and reverse mappings remain under formal mathematical review.
Read the formal review itemsAdopted source, conditions and previous versions
Chapter 1 §II, Eqs. (1.1)–(1.20)
Equation-by-equation check of scale factor, projection, components and transverse result; A1–A5 review retained
Conditions retained in this adoption
- A1–A5; tt′≠0; 0≤v<c
- Directed effective length is not an arbitrary Euclidean vector norm
Specific unresolved source issues
- FINAL-CH1-PAIRING
Source locators: p0309 · p0311 · p0327 · p0331 · p0333 · p0335 · p0337 · p0348 · p0360 · p0365
Manuscript SHA-256: ddbade997b45913248e588953b1d27ccb9c7c206c3c8d992d3aef2364a64836e
Download source identity manifest
The manifest identifies the source; it is not the complete manuscript. Adopting this source does not upgrade evidence or grant a new licence.
Previous source, retained as history
CH1-caf38018fc5a · Chapter 1, Section II, Eqs. (1.1)–(1.19), PDF pp. 4–7; Eq. (1.20) as context
Position within the framework
These links index inputs and research relationships. The completion status of each derivation is specified in its text. Untranslated supporting pages open in Chinese.
Depends on
Metrological FoundationsRevision history
Chapter 1 · Chapter 1 §II, Eqs. (1.1)–(1.20)
This is the English translation of the Chinese canonical module, based on the same final-manuscript source snapshot. The Chinese final manuscript remains authoritative. Website equation IDs are stable citation identifiers; original manuscript numbers are listed separately.
Knowledge scopeASD: Length Vector Effect · Full Derivation. ASD-DOC-THEORY-LVE-DERIVATION-EN. Version 1.1.0; 2026-10-24. https://asd-physics.org/en/theory/lve/derivation. Chapter 1 §II, Eqs. (1.1)–(1.20). Source ASD-BOOK-ddbade997b45.
Continue with the assumptions, equations and sources.
These links carry this page and its source version into the research workspace. Each request pins its knowledge snapshot. Model availability is shown in the workspace; retrieval and private export remain available.