Global Prediction Registry
Stable Prediction IDs separate shared results, candidate differences and closed predictions, with device and data gaps explicit.
Registry and comparison planning; no new canonical physical result or closed quantitative discriminator.
01Registry
Directional atomic-clock response
Research this claimCANDIDATE DISCRIMINATOR · Candidate discriminator
- Observable
- Differential fractional synchronous clock ratio versus axis orientation or sidereal time.
- ΔO
- ΔO is not established; no 10⁻¹² amplitude is assigned.
- Status / device calculation
- PROPOSED / INCOMPLETE
Full protocol and falsification criterion
- Theory sources
- Length Vector EffectTime · Clocks and Frequency
- Equation dependencies
- ASD-WEB-LVE-008ASD-WEB-LVE-011ASD-WEB-TIME-005
- ASD prediction
- Unknown: transition, reference-clock and transfer responses must be derived independently; geometry alone is not a frequency shift.
- Comparison prediction
- Clock ratio under the fixed protocol, including magnetic, thermal, kinematic, gravitational and transfer corrections; no unmodelled directional term.
- Experimental configuration
- Fix species, transition, quantization axis, latitude, background direction, starting sidereal phase, cadence, reference and transfer link.
- Required precision
- Derive amplitude/frequency first; determine test power from covariance and sampling window.
- Systematic effects
- Zeeman, blackbody, Stark, second-order Doppler, gravitational potential, servo, rotation-correlated magnetic field, transfer and solar-day aliasing.
- Existing data
- Published clock-ratio and Lorentz-symmetry tests exist; no raw time series for this ASD configuration is loaded.
- Falsification criterion
- Preregister a nonzero modulation with independently fixed parameters and likelihood. If calibrated confidence intervals exclude it, constrain that clock-specific LVE-to-readout mapping.
- Code / data
- Protocol templates and comparison baselines are downloadable; no ASD device fit or raw experimental data are included.
Muon survival and counts under LVE
Research this claimCANDIDATE DISCRIMINATOR · Candidate discriminator
- Observable
- N(E,θ) and joint upper/lower station count ratios for the same production spectrum and acceptance.
- ΔO
- ASD hazard is undefined, so ΔN is not calculated.
- Status / device calculation
- PROPOSED / INCOMPLETE
Full protocol and falsification criterion
- Equation dependencies
- ASD-WEB-LVE-017ASD-WEB-LVE-018
- ASD prediction
- Chapter 1 Eqs. (1.45)–(1.46) give the illustrative path L=643√999 m≈20323.3 m from approximate inputs. Survival still requires an independently specified decay law, production and energy spectra, propagation and detector acceptance.
- Comparison prediction
- P=exp[−∫ds/(βγcτμ)], folded with energy loss, production distributions, efficiency and migration.
- Experimental configuration
- Fix spectrum, production altitude, zenith, material, livetime, geometric acceptance, threshold and energy reconstruction.
- Required precision
- Depends on ΔN, count statistics and shared normalization; not inferred from one path example.
- Systematic effects
- Atmospheric temperature/pressure, hadronic production, energy loss, trigger, dead time, background and spectrum–acceptance degeneracy.
- Existing data
- PDG provides a cosmic-ray review and references; acceptance-qualified bin data are not yet imported.
- Falsification criterion
- With statistical mapping, production model and calibration fixed, a joint likelihood excludes N_ASD; the immediate target is that path-to-decay mapping.
- Code / data
- Protocol templates and comparison baselines are downloadable; no ASD device fit or raw experimental data are included.
High-γ charge-field detector readout
Research this claimCANDIDATE DISCRIMINATOR · Candidate discriminator
- Observable
- Normalized electro-optic differential signal S(t), or independently calibrated V(t).
- ΔO
- ΔS(t) is unavailable; a standard field curve cannot be relabelled ASD.
- Status / device calculation
- PROPOSED / INCOMPLETE
Full protocol and falsification criterion
- Theory sources
- Moving-Charge Fields: Geometry, Flux and DetectionHigh-γ Charge Field and EO Workbench
- Equation dependencies
- ASD-WEB-EM-012ASD-WEB-EM-013ASD-WEB-EM-022ASD-WEB-EM-040
- ASD prediction
- High-speed source field, laboratory mapping and crystal response are not jointly closed.
- Comparison prediction
- Maxwell–Lorentz signal for the same bunch, boundary, dielectric, laser and detector.
- Experimental configuration
- Beam energy, bunch density, impact parameter, conductor boundary, crystal orientation/thickness, laser width, sampling and calibration.
- Required precision
- Set by response-filtered ΔS and time-domain covariance, not by an ideal point-field peak.
- Systematic effects
- Phase matching, crystal bandwidth, multiple reflections, beam irradiation, timing jitter, gain and background.
- Existing data
- Ota et al. (2022) is published; its data/code statement requires a reasonable request to the authors. Neither is acquired here.
- Falsification criterion
- With common inputs and independently fixed gain, test the full waveform and covariance; reject the specified source–probe construction.
- Code / data
- Protocol templates and comparison baselines are downloadable; no ASD device fit or raw experimental data are included.
S301 candidate orbital case
Research this claimCANDIDATE DISCRIMINATOR · Candidate discriminator
- Observable
- Epoch astrometry and radial velocity where applicable.
- ΔO
- Within the chosen static exterior construction that has the Schwarzschild form, neither higher order nor strong field alone establishes a nonzero difference. Specify a justified different constitutive or source input, then calculate the same apparatus observable and error budget.
- Status / device calculation
- DATA-GATED / INCOMPLETE
Full protocol and falsification criterion
- Theory sources
- Orbital Dynamics · Action, Conservation and PrecessionS301: Data-Gated Orbital Research
- Equation dependencies
- ASD-WEB-GRV-024ASD-WEB-GRV-032
- ASD prediction
- Pending object identification, inputs and joint fit; the current spherical exterior model may be equivalent.
- Comparison prediction
- Standard orbital fit with the same coordinates, mass, distance and selection.
- Experimental configuration
- Epochs, time scale, astrometry, RV, errors, covariance, reference frame and instrument calibration.
- Required precision
- Pending a nondegenerate difference and parameter covariance.
- Systematic effects
- Reference-frame drift, RV zero point, distance/mass degeneracy, extended mass and source confusion.
- Existing data
- DATA-GATED: object verification and raw epoch data are missing.
- Falsification criterion
- After all data gates pass, test the fixed gravity construction in joint observation space; record non-discrimination if equivalent.
- Code / data
- Protocol templates and comparison baselines are downloadable; no ASD device fit or raw experimental data are included.
Static gravitational redshift
Research this claimREINTERPRETED · Shared observable, different interpretation
- Observable
- Two-clock frequency ratio under a common reference.
- ΔO
- Equivalent within the stated static model: ΔO=0, not a distinct prediction.
- Status / device calculation
- NON-DISCRIMINATING / LIMITED MODEL
Full protocol and falsification criterion
- Theory sources
- Gravitational Redshift · Scale, Wavelength and Frequency
- Equation dependencies
- ASD-WEB-GRV-009ASD-WEB-TIME-006
- ASD prediction
- The stated static scale construction gives the corresponding frequency ratio.
- Comparison prediction
- GR frequency ratio for the same static background and protocol.
- Experimental configuration
- Static source, clock positions, common reference and transfer protocol.
- Required precision
- Greater precision cannot distinguish identical functions.
- Systematic effects
- Height, background potential, clock offsets and transfer.
- Existing data
- Primary references are in the gravity matrix; no new fit is claimed.
- Falsification criterion
- A discrepancy constrains shared static-model and apparatus assumptions, not specifically the ASD interpretation.
- Code / data
- Protocol templates and comparison baselines are downloadable; no ASD device fit or raw experimental data are included.
Weak-field deflection and delay
Research this claimREPRODUCED · Reproduced result
- Observable
- Ray deflection angle and fixed-endpoint propagation delay.
- ΔO
- ΔO=0 at the checked order; no independent higher-order difference is established.
- Status / device calculation
- NON-DISCRIMINATING / LIMITED MODEL
Full protocol and falsification criterion
- Theory sources
- Light Deflection · From Optical Path to RaysShapiro Delay · Excess Optical Path and Propagation Counts
- Equation dependencies
- ASD-WEB-GRV-016ASD-WEB-GRV-021
- ASD prediction
- Standard coefficients recovered in the stated approximation.
- Comparison prediction
- GR result at the same order, geometry, mass and coordinates.
- Experimental configuration
- Weak static background, fixed endpoints and a shared impact parameter.
- Required precision
- A nondegenerate difference must be established first; no distinct precision target here.
- Systematic effects
- Media delay, source motion, orbit, mass and calibration.
- Existing data
- Gravity-matrix primary references retained; no refit.
- Falsification criterion
- Tests the optical limit; common failure also requires checking shared inputs.
- Code / data
- Protocol templates and comparison baselines are downloadable; no ASD device fit or raw experimental data are included.
Standard parallel moving-charge configuration
Research this claimREINTERPRETED · Shared observable, different interpretation
- Observable
- Force on co-moving parallel charges at a defined transverse separation.
- ΔO
- A shared result when operational definitions agree; general source/probe extension remains open.
- Status / device calculation
- NON-DISCRIMINATING / LIMITED MODEL
Full protocol and falsification criterion
- Theory sources
- Why Does Magnetic Interaction Arise?
- Equation dependencies
- ASD-WEB-EM-010ASD-WEB-EM-006
- ASD prediction
- LVE magnetic-force algebra under the stated distance/force definitions.
- Comparison prediction
- Maxwell–Lorentz total force for the same configuration.
- Experimental configuration
- Equal speeds, parallel motion, transverse separation; specify force–distance coordinate pairing.
- Required precision
- This configuration provides no distinct difference from which to infer precision.
- Systematic effects
- Distance calibration, beam profile, carrier speed and coordinate conventions.
- Existing data
- Algebraic comparison is documented; this is not a high-speed EO fit.
- Falsification criterion
- Test the specified force-to-readout mapping; this setup does not exclude every general-field candidate.
- Code / data
- Protocol templates and comparison baselines are downloadable; no ASD device fit or raw experimental data are included.
Free longitudinal spatial-wave detection
Research this claimCANDIDATE DISCRIMINATOR · Candidate discriminator
- Observable
- Polarization, phase and frequency/length response in a specified source and detector.
- ΔO
- No measurable amplitude difference yet.
- Status / device calculation
- PROPOSED / INCOMPLETE
Full protocol and falsification criterion
- Theory sources
- Free Longitudinal Spatial Waves
- Equation dependencies
- No equation set yet closes this observable; see source pages.
- ASD prediction
- Free longitudinal modes are a research target; source strength and detector coupling are undetermined.
- Comparison prediction
- Common acoustic, thermal, electromagnetic and instrumental background model.
- Experimental configuration
- Specify excitation, shielding, coupling, polarization and distance scans.
- Required precision
- Depends on source strength, coupling and noise spectrum.
- Systematic effects
- Mechanical/acoustic propagation, thermal drift, EM crosstalk and ground vibration.
- Existing data
- No dedicated free spatial-longitudinal-wave detection dataset is published here.
- Falsification criterion
- A null result constrains a longitudinal-mode candidate only after nonzero detector coupling is fixed; GW speed is not a longitudinal-mode detection.
- Code / data
- Protocol templates and comparison baselines are downloadable; no ASD device fit or raw experimental data are included.
Particle mass spectrum from shared inputs
Research this claimCANDIDATE DISCRIMINATOR · Candidate discriminator
- Observable
- Electron/proton mass ratio and responses associated with the same solutions.
- ΔO
- Not calculated; particle-by-particle tuning is not a prediction.
- Status / device calculation
- PROPOSED / INCOMPLETE
Full protocol and falsification criterion
- Theory sources
- Mass: Compute Energy, Inertia and Gravity SeparatelyOP-MAT-006 · Particle Mass Spectrum
- Equation dependencies
- No equation set yet closes this observable; see source pages.
- ASD prediction
- Complete stable solutions and a spectrum from shared constants are missing.
- Comparison prediction
- Measured masses and established particle phenomenology as requirements.
- Experimental configuration
- First fix action, solution sectors, calibration observables, units and shared parameters.
- Required precision
- Establish theoretical/numerical errors before comparing measurement uncertainty.
- Systematic effects
- Model truncation, mesh/boundary effects, solution error and calibration reuse.
- Existing data
- The matter matrix lists experimental requirements; no ASD mass-spectrum dataset exists here.
- Falsification criterion
- Exclude the specified topology realization if a fixed model fails masses/responses outside its calibration set.
- Code / data
- Protocol templates and comparison baselines are downloadable; no ASD device fit or raw experimental data are included.
Single-particle quantum apparatus discriminator
Research this claimCANDIDATE DISCRIMINATOR · Candidate discriminator
- Observable
- Event-distribution difference for identical preparation, boundaries and detection protocol.
- ΔO
- ΔP is not established; Born statistics cannot be a hidden ASD input.
- Status / device calculation
- PROPOSED / INCOMPLETE
Full protocol and falsification criterion
- Equation dependencies
- No equation set yet closes this observable; see source pages.
- ASD prediction
- Effective envelopes and conditional intensities exist; a distinct event distribution is not derived.
- Comparison prediction
- Standard single-particle quantum model including the same detector response.
- Experimental configuration
- Fix source, paths, surface potentials, environment, detector and event definition.
- Required precision
- Depends on nondegenerate differences and count statistics.
- Systematic effects
- Decoherence, efficiency, thresholds, background, drift and postselection.
- Existing data
- Known quantum experiments are phenomenological requirements; no distinct ASD fit here.
- Falsification criterion
- Exclude a fixed core–field–detector coupling; report non-discrimination if it only recovers the standard relation.
- Code / data
- Protocol templates and comparison baselines are downloadable; no ASD device fit or raw experimental data are included.
Rotating-loop area term
Research this claimREPRODUCED · Reproduced result
- Observable
- Counter-propagating time difference or calibrated phase difference.
- ΔO
- ΔO=0 at the checked order.
- Status / device calculation
- NON-DISCRIMINATING / LIMITED MODEL
Full protocol and falsification criterion
- Theory sources
- Experimental Relations and Tests
- Equation dependencies
- ASD-WEB-LVE-015ASD-WEB-LVE-016
- ASD prediction
- Area term obtained within the stated rotating-loop approximation.
- Comparison prediction
- Standard Sagnac relation for the same configuration and order.
- Experimental configuration
- Closed loop, area vector, angular velocity and medium.
- Required precision
- A shared term alone cannot set a discriminating precision.
- Systematic effects
- Loop deformation, backscatter, dispersion and readout offset.
- Existing data
- Sources are retained in the LVE matrix; no new apparatus result.
- Falsification criterion
- Tests the shared area term; failure does not automatically select an alternative interpretation.
- Code / data
- Protocol templates and comparison baselines are downloadable; no ASD device fit or raw experimental data are included.
02Four categories and promotion criteria
| Category | Minimum meaning | Discrimination |
|---|---|---|
| REPRODUCED | Known result recovered under stated conditions | No |
| REINTERPRETED | Same observable with a different physical interpretation | No |
| CANDIDATE DISCRIMINATOR | A worthwhile possible difference; device closure incomplete | Not yet |
| QUANTITATIVE DISCRIMINATOR | Both readouts, difference, domain, errors and identifiability are specified | Conditional |
Promotion requires a reproducible under common inputs and readout definitions. Different internal fields, adjustable amplitudes, published anomalies or better precision alone do not qualify. Matter and Quantum phenomenological requirements remain in their original matrices; they do not automatically become reproduced results.
03Identifiers, versions and review
IDs are retained permanently. Withdrawal or merger requires a reason and successor ID; old IDs are not recycled. Expand a record to inspect its sources, dependencies, protocol and exclusion scope. The downloadable JSON registry shares the page's data source; see the source manifest.
Position within the framework
These links index inputs and research relationships. The completion status of each derivation is specified in its text. Untranslated supporting pages open in Chinese.
Revision history
Existing canonical module snapshots / 现有正式模块快照 · Predictions & Falsification v1.0 · review 2026-09-22
Download source and scope manifest
Based on versioned canonical modules and cited instrument literature. This experimental program adds operational templates, not new canonical field equations.
Knowledge scopeASD: Global Prediction Registry. ASD-EXP-TESTS-PREDICTIONS-EN. Version 1.0.0; 2026-09-22. https://asd-physics.org/en/tests/predictions. Predictions & Falsification v1.0 · review 2026-09-22. Source EXP-7ca61744dcd2.
Continue with the assumptions, equations and sources.
These links carry this page and its source version into the research workspace. Each request pins its knowledge snapshot. Model availability is shown in the workspace; retrieval and private export remain available.